On 9/29/13, John Marshall <john.marsh...@riverwillow.com.au> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, 17:27 +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> On 9/28/13, John Marshall <john.marsh...@riverwillow.com.au> wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, 11:12 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:07:28AM +1000, John Marshall wrote: >> >> > The first two panics were triggered when shutting down the ntpd >> >> > daemon >> >> > (a recent development snapshot version of ntpd: 4.2.7p387). Exiting >> >> > a >> >> > later release (p388) has not triggered the panic. The system >> >> > panicked >> >> > again overnight, this time while acting as an sftp server receiving >> >> > large (GB) files from another system. >> > >> >> > I have made the core.txt.[0-2] files available in the following >> >> > directory. The directory is not browsable. >> >> > >> >> > http://www.riverwillow.net.au/~john/92rc4/ >> >> >> >> This might be fixed by r254087-r254090 on stable/9. >> > >> > Thank you. Those patches applied cleanly to releng/9.2 so I rebuilt a >> > patched 9.2. I double-checked and verified that the following patched >> > files in my releng/9.2@255904 working copy were identical to the same >> > files in stable/9@254090, then I removed /usr/obj/* and built a fresh >> > system. > >> > The system panicked as follows during shutdown after its first boot. >> > The corresponding core.txt.3 file is available at the same location >> > previously posted. > >> > I have now seen this panic on a second server as well (also amd64 but >> > different hardware vendor). This second (unpatched) system also >> > panicked during shutdown as follows. Corresponding file named >> > core.txt.0.system2 is available at the same location as above. > >> try this from 9-STABLE: >> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/98362329be8e2cdefda1988e5e9d32efbc94855f > > Thanks Oliver. If I followed the links correctly, that looks like > r255507 on stable/9. The second part of that patch didn't apply cleanly > to 9.2. I investigated and it looks like that is because r254442 had > also been applied since 9.2. I'm guessing I should also apply r254442 > as well (first)? I shall proceed with applying both patches, rebuild, > and see what happens.
This patch affected only those kernels, that has cpuctl. When no cpuctl loaded, has no effect. > > -- > John Marshall > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
