Bezüglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtime): > ... > >>>> IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug > fix. re@ > >>> asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, and > at > >>> this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing possible > >>> regressions, which will only delay the 9.2-RELEASE. > >>> > >>> Glen > >>> > >>> OK, then we need a release notes telling people a sane value for > >> nmbclusters and friends so that they know how to make 10gigE work. > >> > >> I'll poll my team for a value if someone else has one, that would be > even > >> better. > >> > >> -- > >> Alfred Perlstein > >> VP Software Engineering, iXsystems > > > > > >Is there a possibility that a separate unofficial patch set could be > >released for people who want the autotuning but do not want to run 9 > >stable after 9.2 is released. > >I would like the autotuning, but i am a little reluctent to use other > >stable stuff i will get when tracking stable. > > > >Regards > >Johan > > Hi, > > I think that's a good point. > > In our company, it�s not allowed to use the stable tree for any > production system. Little and useful patches are still allowed. > > Having a central point with a description of each patch it would be > much easier to update the release version with the needed patches.
You're welcome using my "deploy-tools" patchsets. I'm deploying RELENG only, but with local patchset-policy. Originally, these are automtically handled during build-process with deploy-tools, but of course you can selective/manually apply the desired patches from the "local-patches" directory: ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/ Best regards, -Harry
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
