Nope. It's a -10 thing.
-adrian On 14 July 2013 08:01, Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > from the mailing lists I couldn't figure out whether 11n is supposed > to work on stable since the existing mail threads seem to focus on > current exclusively. > > And since the option exists in the stable kernel code as well, albeit > neither in GENERIC nor in NOTES, I thought I could give it a try > anyway. > > I had some partial success. Test in station mode, WPA2 associated > properly, light traffic (browsing the web) seems to work okay as well. > However as soon as I try to really push some data through it, e.g. > rsync large files, the card drops all network traffic until I > disassociate and re-associate with the access point again (e.g. netif > restart). > > If 11N is just not ready in -stable yet, it's not a problem, but if > it's supposed to work, I'd begin to collect debugging information. > > So, is it supposed to work on a 9-stable as of today? > > Best regards > Riggs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
