On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:57:16AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > But in the OP's case, the situation sounds dire given the limitations -- > limitations that someone (apparently not him) chose, which greatly > hinder debugging/troubleshooting. Had a heterogeneous setup been > chosen, the debugging/troubleshooting pains are less (IMO). When I see > this, it makes me step back and ponder the decisions that lead to the > ZFS-only setup.
As an observer (though one who has used ZFS for some time, now), I might suggest that this can at least -seem- like FUD about ZFS because the "limitations" don't necessarily have anything to do with ZFS. That is, a situation in which one cannot recover, nor even effectively troubleshoot, if there is a problem, will be a "dire" one, regardless of what the problem might be or where its source might lie. -- greg byshenk - gbysh...@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL - Portland, OR USA _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
