On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:52:23PM +0900, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: cpuid = 2; apic id = 02 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: fault virtual address = 0x7818c3798 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: fault code = supervisor write > data, page not present > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: instruction pointer = > 0x20:0xffffffff8162c19e > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: stack pointer = > 0x28:0xffffff8121b22860 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: frame pointer = > 0x28:0xffffff8121b22870 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit > 0xfffff, type 0x1b > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, > resume, IOPL = 0 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: current process = 15360 > (ifconfig) > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: trap number = 12 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: panic: page fault > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: cpuid = 2 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #0 0xffffffff80923446 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #1 0xffffffff808ed0be at panic+0x1ce > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #2 0xffffffff80c7e330 at trap_fatal+0x290 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #3 0xffffffff80c7e668 at trap_pfault+0x1e8 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #4 0xffffffff80c7ec6e at trap+0x3be > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #5 0xffffffff80c682ef at calltrap+0x8 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #6 0xffffffff8162c76d at > pfi_change_group_event+0x4d > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #7 0xffffffff809a0d3b at if_delgroup+0x38b > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #8 0xffffffff809a7846 at > if_clone_destroyif+0x136 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #9 0xffffffff809a831a at if_clone_destroy+0x17a > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #10 0xffffffff809a5892 at ifioctl+0x482 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #11 0xffffffff80934ef6 at kern_ioctl+0x106 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #12 0xffffffff8093513d at sys_ioctl+0xfd > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #13 0xffffffff80c7dc10 at amd64_syscall+0x540 > May 4 11:19:46 xxxxxx kernel: #14 0xffffffff80c685d7 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7
It looks like it crashed when referring vnet that had already been destroyed, in pfi_change_group_event hook. > Is there any suggestions? VIMAGE+pf support is fragile. If it works for someone it is rather by accident. I expect replacing pf with ipfw_nat or natd will give better results. If you still prefer pf, you may try destroying epair interface before destroying vnet, e.g. using prestop rc.d/jail hooks instead of poststop, if it is possible. -- Mikolaj Golub _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
