Your meta-commentary here is irritating. They're called "quirks" because that is the named given to them in CAM>
Scott On Apr 23, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > .. are we really debating this? > > Stop calling them quirks. That sounds like something that won't mess > up your actual runtime. It's not giving them enough "weight". They're > more "device behaviours" or "device flags" or something. Print them > out like that. I think that _not_ printing them out at boot time is > insane. Doubly so if it could cause issues before you can actually run > commands. > > So if it were me, I'd print out the device quirks like we print out > CPU flags. Ie, all the time. > > > > Adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
