Am Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:57:17 -0800 schrieb 'Jeremy Chadwick' <j...@koitsu.org>:
> Though your OPTIONS recommendations work for you, they do not work for > everyone. Some people sit behind firewalls where HTTP or HTTPS are > the only viable means (native SVN or SVN+SSH will not work for > them). But then, cvsup/csup didn't work either, right? So, what did those people do in the days of cvsup? As for the whole dependency/license nightmare - there is some truth[1] in that and I'm sure, the people "in charge" are aware of it. I was always under the assumption that the switch to svn was more of a temporary stopgap solution where the benefits (progress of the FreeBSD project) out-weighted the deficiencies. The migration to a "better system" is supposed to be easier from svn than cvs... [1] I have the need to have mod_dav_svn in my subversion-package (because a customer needs it and I only want to maintain one pkgng-repo). Thus, every time svn is installed, apache gets pulled in, too. Awesome. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
