On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Frank Staals wrote:
> This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this
> point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working
> on it (or at least: there is a svnsup project). For details please
> search recent ports or questions mailing list archives. As far as I know
> there is also no alternative svn-client.
Pointer to svnsup is fine; it seems I just missed to the first hint.
> I'm kind of surprised for the need of this though. Why not simply use
> portsnap if you are not actively developing ports?
Well, for ports this is mostly fine, though on several places I prefer
to use csup (or svn now) even for ports, since I maintain quite a set of
local patches - this sometimes gives problems together with potsnap.
Where this is neede, I have a shared ports tree anyway, so the whole svn
setup is only needed in one machine.
But my main concern is the system sources anyway. freebsd-update is not
feasible for me, as described in the original post.
Thank you,
Oliver
--
| Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ o...@sysadm.in |
| Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. |
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
