On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Fleuriot Damien <m...@my.gd> wrote: > Hello list, > > > I'm running 8.3-stable r245223 from a mere 2 days ago and am in the process > of building a custom release for our internal use as preconfigured firewalls. > > "make release" works pretty fine except for a few quirks here and there. > > > > First of all, I have set EXTLOCALDIR so that the release contains my existing > /usr/local/ , and thus the collection of installed ports. > > The problem here is that while /release/usr/local/ is correctly populated, > the ISO images and ftp install directory have an empty usr/local/ > Extracting the ISO's base.?? files doesn't yield the /usr/local/ contents > either. > > > > > The second problem I encounter is with the kernel's build. > Apparently "make release" doesn't pull MODULES_OVERRIDE from /etc/make.conf > and decides to build every single module, as opposed to my own restricted > list. > > I'm going to try with with KERNEL_FLAGS=-DMODULES_OVERRIDE module1 module2 in > /usr/src/release/Makefile > > > > Has anyone else ever experienced the same problem regarding the inclusion of > /usr/local/ in their release ? >
Reposting to -stable in the hope of getting feedback, having received none on -questions. Has anyone experienced this before ? Is this intended behaviour ? I fail to see the purpose of including /usr/local/ if it won't be packaged into the release images. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
