On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Alfred Perlstein <bri...@mu.org> wrote: >> There are arguments on both sides; some (perhaps you) feel SVN has/ >> provides more options, others (maybe myself) feel the same can be >> accomplished with CVS, and that migration only causes more initial >> (and unnecessary) overhead. I'll leave it at that. :) > > Chris, > > I think you've gotten to your NYE jubilations a bit early. > > Sure the same can be accomplished by CVS, the same way a mission to the moon > could be accomplished with enough black powder and a sailing ship. > > It just won't be a pleasant trip. > > Go finish whatever you're drinking and have a great 2013. > > When you wake up, go crack a book on SVN and you'll only be living in 2007. > > > -Alfred >
Anyone who has had the "pleasure" of being an admin charge of a CVS repository will not want to go back to it after discovering what SVN and GIT have to offer. Just my 2c -Kimmo _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
