Am Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:32:49 -0700 schrieb Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>:
> Guys/girls/etc, > > I do suggest that someone actually spends some time coming up with a > table of "what the current state is", "what we could do", "what would > happen if we did that." > > Right now there's a lot of possibilities (new drive, drive with > windows, drive with linux, drive with linux/windows, drive with legacy > freebsd MBR, etc) and as an outsider trying to figure out what is > actually the "right" sounding behaviour, it's difficult for me to sit > down and digest all these emails that chip away at a bit of the > problem at a time. > > So if you'd like to see this fixed, I really do suggest that one of > you dumps some time into coming up with a basic table like I said > above, work with others who can correct/flesh out the various options > to take into account, and then we can come up with a real solution. > Then 9.1 can go out the door. > If I select the "entire disk" for FreeBSD, I think it's a reasonable assumption that the MBR should replaced, too. Please don't make people install FreeBSD 9.0 first on disks with non-FreeBSD MRRs and then upgrade to 9.1. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
