--- On Mon, 9/24/12, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> wrote: > From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> > Subject: Re: Tinderbox spam > To: "Chris Rees" <utis...@gmail.com> > Cc: sta...@freebsd.org > Date: Monday, September 24, 2012, 5:51 PM > Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> > writes: > > "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <d...@des.no> writes: > > > Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> > writes: > > > > Have you tried using http:// ? > > > Both should work, but svn is significantly > faster. > > Yes, that's why I tried it instead, but my point is > that you may need > > to sleep a bit between tries; if svn is faster, you're > more likely to > > hit any rate limit. > > It sleeps for 30, then 60, then 90 seconds and gives up > after the fourth > attempt.
What about rate limiting between parallel checkouts for builds for different architectures? Are those staggered, or will svn.freebsd.org be seeing 6-7 different svn connections starting at the same time, when the builds start? The logs seem to show that all attempted builds start at the exact same time. Examples (snipped from 3 different mails): TB --- 2012-09-25 02:30:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-09-25 02:30:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-09-25 02:30:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no Regards, Alex _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
