No reason other than history... will be changing over at some point.
Charles Owens
Great Bay Software, Inc.
On 6/15/12 10:38 AM, Brian W. wrote:
Curious why you are preferring i386 +PAE as opposed to amd64?
On Jun 15, 2012 4:09 AM, "Charles Owens" <cow...@greatbaysoftware.com
<mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>> wrote:
Yes, of course. So far I can say that the major shift appears to
have occurred between 8.1 and 8.2 .
Thanks,
Charles Owens
Great Bay Software, Inc.
Sent from my phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adr...@freebsd.org <mailto:adr...@freebsd.org>>
To: "Charles Owens" <cow...@greatbaysoftware.com
<mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>>
Cc: <sta...@freebsd.org <mailto:sta...@freebsd.org>>
Subject: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1
Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 1:55 am
Hm, can you try different subversion checkouts of the kernel tree
between 8.1 and 8.3, to pinpoint which commit(s) broke things?
ADrian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
<mailto:freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org>"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
