On 6/1/2012 18:03, Jason Leschnik wrote:
I may be totally incorrect with my above ideas, but it's what i would like to see from FreeBSD *again*... This is the reason in the first place most people used FreeBSD, stability/scalability/performance are the hallmarks of FreeBSD. If we have these hard hitting numbers released frequently it gives the dev team a good indication of how changes reflect on performance.
This is a good point and the kind of stuff that would make a, for example, great Slashdot post once finished.
Of course there would be arguments but I think it would be good exposure. It certainly would be nice to have a place to point to these things vs. just saying "its more better and stabler", too. And if its not at least its acknowledged so it can be fixed.
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
