On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:48:16AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:57:40AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > > Trying to build 8-stable i386 for the last couple of days gives this > > error when building the kernel: > > > > /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -c -O -pipe -march=prescott -std=c99 -g > > -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef > > -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include > > opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 > > --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > > -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -Werror vers.c > > linking kernel.debug > > ld: kernel.debug: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 5, need 6) > > ld: final link failed: Bad value > > *** Error code 1 > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > 1 error > > The freebsd-stable mailing list has been filled with tinderbox failures > for this exact problem with the LINT kernel, and it appears to be > specific to RELENG_8 on i386. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-February/thread.html > > Start from the bottom and search upwards for the string: > "[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386" > > Point being: the problem is not you. >
This is why I don't like ccache. Technically the problem is there but also coexists within the source itself. For whatever reason I would believe a cached copy of already built source is having some collisions. As already stated "NO CCACHE" the kernel can be built with what I posted on three different machines. -- ;s =;
pgpYIoGesw7M8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
