В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400 Andrey Chernov <a...@freebsd.org> пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the > > >> problem has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE > > >> scheduler. > > > > > > I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine > > > (Pentium 4) in very visible places, like 'ps ax' output stucks in > > > the middle by ~1 second. When I switch back to SHED_4BSD, all > > > slowness is gone. > > > > Are you able to provide KTR traces of the scheduler results? > > Something that can be fed to schedgraph? > > Sorry, this machine is not mine anymore. I try SCHED_ULE on Core 2 > Duo instead and don't notice this effect, but it is overall pretty > fast comparing to that Pentium 4. > Give me, please, detailed instructions on how to do it - I'll do it ... Be a shame if this the theme is will end again just only the discussions ... :( _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"