On 15/11/2011 01:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:56:07PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I don't particularly care what the man page says, I just know what
>>> works. :-)
>> If there is something in the man page that is not precise, I personally
>> am interested in any inconsistencies with reality so they can be fixed.
>> Even given your detailed explanation, I'm still not 100% clear on what,
>> if anything, is incorrect in the manual.
> FWIW, neither am I. The OP seems to be basing his argument syntaxes
> based on what's in the man page, so if something is vague, confusing,
> or inaccurate, he will need to state clearly what it is that's an
> anomaly.
>
> My comment was more along the lines of: "if it's wrong in the man page,
> I'm really not that concerned" (e.g. file a PR and be done with it).
> I'm still trying to work out exactly what it is the OP wants
> statistics-wise on a per-interface basis. I'm left thinking he wants
> "netstat -s" output per-interface, but that's not going to happen.
>
You are correct, my reading of the manpage suggested that per interface
stats should be available.
netstat -i | -I interface -s [-f protocol_family | -p protocol] [-M core]
[-N system]
Display per-interface statistics for each network protocol, for a
particular protocol_family, or for a single protocol.
As that was incorrect then I do consider the manpage to need updating. I'll
file a PR but I wasnt sure if this was correct behavior or not.
Thanks,
Vince
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
