Ken Smith <kensm...@buffalo.edu> writes: > On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ? >> >> Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been >> released, no date set. stable/9 has been created, no date set. >> Branch status has not been updated. > > I'll get to more of it later tonight. > >> At most, this edit is a bad joke, just like politician announcing >> a few millions dollars in saving when the yearly budget is in >> deficit by trillions... > > Or an edit done in the 5 minutes I had at the time so people who wanted > to know the times of things that haven't happened already can get what > they want to know. > >> For the record, I would have made a much better job, if you had let >> me. > > I'd love to know what you would have put for the dates I filled in.
There is also a similar schedule page at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/schedule.html. It is still out of date and shows about the same as the other page did. The distrowatch.org site shows scheduled releases for linux and *BSD, and they showed BETA1 and BETA2 as originally scheduled. As a result, there were a few requests on freebsd-questions asking where to get the releases. Of course they hadn't been released, so they no longer show any scheduled releases for FreeBSD, but still do for NetBSD and OpenBSD. -- Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
