On Aug 24, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> >> It may also be interesting to try 9.x on a machine with a serial >> port that operates directly with uart(4). Does stty(4) throw up >> "isn't a terminal" errors against the .init and .lock devices >> relating to those ports? I would try this myself, but am very short >> of time at present. >> >> >> Though there is probably little more that I can add, please keep me >> cc'd on all relevant e-mails, especially as I do not follow >> freebsd-current. > > I'm CC'ing Marcel Moolenaar here, who's the author of uart(4), to help > assist in this matter and shed some light on the above comments. If > there's a quirk or bug there, I'm certain he'll assist in helping.
There's no obvious problem in uart(4). The handling of *.init and *.lock is all unified in the TTY layer. Note that the typical scenario for uart(4) to not respect the baud rate setting is when the UART port is a system device (i.e. serial console or debug port). Make sure there's no difference between 8.x and 9.x with respect to which ports are declared as system ports. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
