On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:31:49 +0100, Damien Fleuriot <m...@my.gd> wrote:
On 1/1/11 6:28 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
On 2 January 2011 02:11, Damien Fleuriot <m...@my.gd> wrote:
I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves
reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15.
that was v28 :)
saw no major difference between v14 and v15.
JY
Oopsie :)
Seeing I for one will have no backups, I think I won't be using v28 on
this box, and stick with v15 instead.
Are there any views regarding the "best" implementation for a system ?
I currently have a ZFS only system but I'm planning on moving it to UFS,
with ZFS used only for mass storage.
I understand ZFS root is much trickier, and my main fear is that if I
somehow break ZFS (by upgrading to v28 for example) I won't be able to
boot anymore, thus no repair process...
You can repair by booting from USB of CD in a lot of cases.
Ronald.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"