On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:59:00PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 03/11/2010 22:11 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:01:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> [snipping since I wanna keep it terse] > >> > >> What I propose is that we try to find a resolution, because I suppose you > >> can't > >> stay at the last working revision forever. > >> > >> P.S. so will you be trying the patch I proposed? > > > > Andriy, > > > > I can try your patch out on a Core 2 Duo (E8400) which helped test > > the latest Intel CPU topology change when you were looking for testers > > (and had no problem), and can also try it out on a Core 2 Quad Q8400 > > if need be. Both run amd64. > > But I suppose you don't have any problems? :)
Correct; with the original patch you wanted tested, I saw no problems on either of the above systems. But I haven't rebuilt kernel since you MFC'd the patch. Anyway, it sounds like me testing isn't necessary since you have a pretty good idea of what's going on with Dan's setup. -- | Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
