On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > I'm not sure what to expect from these (i.e. what is "normal" in this > case?) but the VM sizes for the NFS-used rpc.statd and rpcbind here look > a bit too big, compared to their resident sizes: > > 778 root 1 44 0 26420K 3256K select 1 0:01 0.00% > rpcbind > 891 root 1 44 0 263M 1296K select 1 0:01 0.00% > rpc.statd > > This is 8-stable amd64. Could there be a memory leak somewhere, > especially in rpc.statd?
FAQ: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#STATD-MEM-LEAK (Short version: That is expected behaviour from rpc.statd) -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
