On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Artem Belevich <fbsdl...@src.cx> wrote: >> As soon as I opened this email I knew what it would say. >> >> >> # time zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | mbuffer | zfs receive >> storage/compressed/bacula-mbuffer >> in @ 197 MB/s, out @ 205 MB/s, 1749 MB total, buffer 0% full > ... >> Big difference. :) > > I'm glad it helped. > > Does anyone know why sending/receiving stuff via loopback is so much > slower compared to pipe?
This may shed some light on that topic: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-September/019877.html _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
