on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: >>> Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both >>> RELENG_8: >>> >>> - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10) >>> - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6) >>> >>> I'll make sure to provide what the topology looks like before and after. >>> Is CPU-relevant dmesg output sufficient? >> >> If you mean something like the below, then yes. Thanks! >> [...] > > All done. Good news (I think): there's no difference in the CPU-related > topology on either system with your patch, aside from kernel build date. > The topologies are still detected correctly. In case you want them: >
Thanks a lot for the test! [test results snipped] > All other systems I have are C2D and C2Q-based, but I can't easily test > on those given their production roles. If there's a particular Intel > processor family/model you're interested in, let me know and I can dig > around to see if I have access to one. No particular models in mind. If you have systems with more complex topologies, like multiple physical packages or HTT enabled, I will be interested in seeing test results for those. Thanks again. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
