On 29.08.2010 19:16, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:33 AM 8/29/2010, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 29.08.2010 16:09, Mike Tancsa wrote:
After upgrading to a recent STABLE, I have been seeing the following sporadic
errors
Aug 28 04:15:15 smarthost2 kernel: TCP: [xx.yy.165.120]:53617 to
[xx.yy.164.50]:25; syncache_socket:
Socket create failed due to limits or memory shortage
this is with
FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #7: Wed Aug 25 15:32:05 EDT 2010
and the previous kernel was from July 20th.
The odd thing is that the error is triggered from a RELENG_6 host only it would
seem. I noticed
there are a number of syncache and tcp updates to RELENG_8, is it possible this
is related ? I dont
have any specific tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf
other than
net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain: 1
net.inet.udp.log_in_vain: 1
The log_in_vain sysctl would cause the logging of syncache errors
as well (net.inet.tcp.log_debug). This was a POLA violation and
I've separated them on August 27 on 8-stable. So if you update
you won't see them anymore. That doesn't change the fact that
the socket create failed though.
If it only happens from a RELENG_6 box it probably is a problem
with port re-usage by RELENG_6. The difficulty is that sonewconn()
fails and doesn't return an error code. Hence it may be one of
listen queue limits reached, memory shortage or a problem with
inserting the inpcb into the hash lists.
Actually, I think I might have found the issue. I was focusing on the "memory"
part not the limits.
The 'RELENG_6 only' is just a fluke as thats a box that sends a lot of email to
this particular
server. It turns out, sendmail was rate limiting the server
sm-mta[25923]: deferring connections on daemon IPv4: 8 per second
and somehow syncache is aware/logs this now where as it did not before ?
When sendmail is deferring the connections it should not show up
in the syncache logs. The accept() by sendmail is much later than
when the socket for a new connection is created in syncache. Here
it points to the limits in the listen queue. Maybe sendmail is
getting behind in accepting new connections and the listen queue
is overflowing.
--
Andre
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"