On 10.07.2010, at 01:53, Markus Gebert wrote:

>> I'm curious if disabling USB legacy support in the BIOS causes it to still 
>> die 
>> even with ehci not loaded.  If so, then the SMI# for the ehci controller 
>> must 
>> somehow prevent the issue, perhaps by triggering frequently enough to slow 
>> the 
>> rate of I/O requests down?
> 
> 
> I disabled usb legacy support in the BIOS and booted a kernel with 
> usb+ohci+ukbd+ums but without ehci. Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the MCE.


Well, the situation has changed. Machine died over the weekend running our test 
load with above kernel configuration. It seems that not having ehci in the 
kernel at boot just makes the MCE much more unlikely to occur, but it occurs. 
With ehci, I can panic the machine within a minute, without ehci it seems to 
take at least hours. Still, I don't get why not having the ehci driver in the 
kernel should have any effect, especially because nothing is attached to it.

Panic message:

----
MCA: Bank 4, Status 0xb400004000030c2b
MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000105, Status 0x0000000000000007
MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0x40f13, APIC ID 2
MCA: CPU 2 UNCOR BUSLG Observer WR I/O
MCA: Address 0xfd00000000
panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) 128 @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1992
cpuid = 2
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 12 tid 100039 ]
Stopped at      kdb_enter+0x3d: movq    $0,0x69ccb0(%rip)
----

Don't know, why it's not a fatal trap 28 this time despite an MCE was detected. 
Seen this before though, also with kernels that have ehci and with usb legacy 
support, so seeing a different panic this time seems not related to the way the 
kernel was configured. Maybe a symptom? Or may it even be useful? If yes, what 
should I pull out of DDB?

In the meantime, I'll try harder to reproduce the MCE on current...


Markus

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to