On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> When looking at the size of a pool, this information can be got from >> both zpool list and zfs list: >> >> > $ zfs list >> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT >> tank 5.69T 982G 36.5K /tank >> >> > $ zpool list >> NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT >> tank 8.14T 6.86T 1.28T 84% ONLINE - >> >> Why the different sizes? >> The pool is a raidz of 6 x 1.5 TB drives. >> > > zpool lists the raw storage available to the pool. Every single bit of > every single drive is listed here. This will be 6 x 1 TB. > > zfs lists only the amount of storage available to be used, after all > redundancy is taken into account. This will be 5 x 1 TB. > > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwc...@gmail.com
Ah, that makes sense - also explains why the df output matches up precisely with the zfs list output. Thanks Tom _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
