On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 22:05 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:33:46 +0200 > Andriy Gapon <a...@icyb.net.ua> wrote: > > > on 10/02/2010 20:29 Vitaly Magerya said the following: > > > Robert Noland wrote: > > >>> It is not, and yes I use WITHOUT_HAL. Currently disabling DRI > > >>> helps; should I try rebuilding xorg-server with HAL? > > >> Yes, you can still disable hal at runtime by setting AutoAddDevices > > >> "Off" in xorg.conf. > > > > > > Seems to work with HAL. > > > > I've long thought that xorg server should be linked with libthr > > regardless of HAL option. Unfortunately, I never came up with patch, > > nor have anyone else. Xorg server really uses pthreads when doing DRM > > and HAL brings in libthr dependency only as an accident. > > > > This is my first post to this list, so hello all. > > I have been running with NoAccel for a long time, since disabling DRI > alone would cause a complete deadlock (screen to standby, no ssh, no > response to keyboard, etc.). > > However, I rebuilt xorg-server with HAL support, and now simply > disabling DRI allows me to start X. > > The card is RV790 based.
Is that an HD5xxx? robert. -- Robert Noland <rnol...@freebsd.org> FreeBSD _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
