On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:56:41PM -0700, David Ehrmann wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:10:58PM -0700, David Ehrmann wrote: > > > >>Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >> > >>>On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 09:22:02PM -0800, David Ehrmann wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>It's been reported before, but I haven't seen anything new. vge > >>>>devices > >>>> > >>>Because I don't have access to the hardware it looks like hard to > >>>fix. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>won't autonegotiate to gigabit speeds, and if I set the media to > >>>>1000baseTX, ifconfig reports "no carrier." This was with two different > >>>>interfaces on the other end, one a switch, the other another computer > >>>>(but not a vge one). > >>>> > >>>>Any ideas? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Would you show me the output of dmesg?(Only vge(4) related one) > >>>Also show me the output of "devinfo -rv | grep phy". > >>> > >>> > >>dmesg: > >> > >>vge0: <VIA Networking Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem > >>0xfeaffc00-0xfeaf > >>fcff irq 28 at device 0.0 on pci3 > >>vge0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x14 type 3 at 0xfeaffc00 > >>miibus0: <MII bus> on vge0 > >>ip1000phy0: <IC Plus IP1001 10/100/1000 media interface> PHY 22 on miibus0 > >>ip1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, > >>1000bas > >>eTX-FDX, auto > >>vge0: WARNING: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface > >>vge0: bpf attached > >>vge0: Ethernet address: 00:40:63:xx:xx:xx > >>ioapic1: routing intpin 4 (PCI IRQ 28) to vector 49 > >>vge0: [MPSAFE] > >>vge0: [ITHREAD] > >> > >> > >>devinfo -rv | grep phy > >> ip1000phy0 pnpinfo oui=0x90c3 model=0x19 rev=0x0 at > >> phyno=22 > >> ukphy0 pnpinfo oui=0x4063 model=0x32 rev=0xa at phyno=1 > >> > >> > > > >Would you try attached patch? Due to lack of hardware access I > >don't know whether it helps or not(Just compilation tested). > > > I have no idea how you did it,
Hmm... it was just a guess and this time I was lucky. :-) > but the patch seems to have worked. Glad to hear that. > ifconfig reports 1000baseTX, and I can nc zeros at more than 50 MB/s. > > Is this patch "stable?" Should it break any existing functionality? As you might guess, only you can say "how stable" for this patch. > What was the problem that it fixed? Will it be in the next 7.x I guess newer IC Plus PHYs require correct next page bit so I just read the autonegotiation advertisement register to cache the next page capability. All other changes are to use mii_phy_add_media() KPI which will remove duplicated codes in phy drivers. > release? 8.0? > Yes, I'll commit the patch soon and make sure to MFC to 7-stable. > Here's the link to the bug id for it: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130846 > Ok, I'll handle the PR. > Thank you! No problem. Thanks for testing! _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
