On Thursday 04 December 2008 16:47:13 Max Laier wrote: > On Thursday 04 December 2008 16:24:23 Vladimir Ermakov wrote: > > problem is fixed in OpenBSD 4.4 > > http://www.openbsd.org/plus44.html > > The bug this note refers to was introduced after OpenBSD 4.1 (our last > import) and should not be present in the FreeBSD code. I'll double check > in a bit to make sure synproxy is working, but I don't think it was broken > after my last import ... do you have a particular test case that I could > reproduce?
Okay ... here is the story: First off, "synproxy state" is *NOT* broken! But you need to be careful how you use it. If you - like the OP - intend to use it to protect a service running on the same box as your pf, you must make sure to "set skip on lo0" or it will not work. If you are protecting a box behind the pf box, there is no need for that. -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"