> Ok, I describe my concern once more. I do not object against the checking > of the inode size. But, if inode size is changed, then some data is added > to the inode, that could (and usually does, otherwise why extend it ?) > change intrerpetation of the inode. Thus, we need a verification of the > fact that simply ignoring added fields does not damage filesystem or > cause user data corruption. Verification != testing.
Ok, I see your point. I will do some more research into the ext2 inode structure on disk and see what happens when inode size > 128. > > Until we make this work, patch cannot go into the tree. > Understood, thanks for your attention. Regards, Josh _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
