David Nixon wrote:
> Now back to your first e-mail. I mentioned the setting for vi in
> response to Chad R. Larson's e-mail. He specifically mentioned that
> he used vi for e-mail in a previous e-mail. If you go back and reread
> his message then you might realize why I mentioned it. I honestly
> ask, does Chad Larson change that setting for e-mail then change
> it back for other vi uses? If not, then he and everyone else who
> does not format their text at less that 65 characters are guilty of
> violating RFC 1855 (as you have quoted this group).
Most people use 80 characters, which is a hell of a lot closer to 65
than your unbroken lines (or broken, depending on which way you look at
it).
> multiple columns just for fun? Anyway, read this extract from RFC 1855 and
....+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6....+....7....+....8
> ***************************************************************************
>
> Count the splats. This line appears in Ben Smithurst's message below. How many
>characters per line?
> Hypocritical..... Welcome to the guilty.
Shit, I'm about 10 characters over the limit. You're a few hundred over.
Nevermind, you're getting boring now. You'll be glad to know you'll get no
more responses from me.
*plonk*
--
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0x99392F7D
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message