I believe that these readings have to do not only with the uneven voltages in
the power supply, b ut also the accuracy of the instruments used to record them.
--cokane

Kip Macy had the audacity to say:
> My machine is not overclocked and I get similar results
> 
> 
> 
>  Motherboard Temp               Voltages
> 
>  26C / 78F / 299K          Vcore1:   +1.953V
>                            Vcore2:   +1.953V
>     Fan Speeds             + 3.3V:   +3.375V
>                            + 5.0V:   +4.906V
>     1: 3013 rpm            +12.0V:  +12.625V
>     2: 3708 rpm            -12.0V:  -13.562V
>     3:    0 rpm            - 5.0V:   -5.584V
> 
> 
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, David Bushong wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 10:03:44PM -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> > > Awhile back I was having trouble getting through kernel compiles, the
> > > machine would reboot during the compile.  Someone on some newsgroup said
> > > "are you overclocking?".  I checked my settings.  No, I wasn't
> > > overclocking.  But my voltage setting looked wrong.  It was set at 2.2
> > > volts or whatever and I thought it was supposed to be at 2.4.  So I
> > > changed it to 2.4.  My problem was solved.  I was flying through the
> > > compiles.  Then I was looking through my motherboard manual and realized
> > > that it was supposed to be set at 2.2 after all.  I prefer it the way it
> > > is though.  Do you think there is anything wrong with that? 
> > > 
> > Hmm.  lmmon -i produces some scary results:
> > 
> >        Voltages
> > 
> >   Vcore1:   +2.781V
> >   Vcore2:   +1.469V
> >   + 3.3V:   +3.312V
> >   + 5.0V:   +4.932V
> >   +12.0V:  +12.250V <--
> >   -12.0V:  -13.125V <--
> >   - 5.0V:   -5.532V <--
> > 
> > Those look disturbingly off.. maybe this much drift is common, I don't know.
> > However, I never have any problem with the machine, other than this benign
> > occurance..  and I do tend to tax it every now and again (couple ports 
> > building, world building, mp3 encodes, the usual).  Ack, can't believe I 
> > forgot to mention I'm running with soft updates enabled on both drives 
> > (and root).  While I was reading this thread btw, I got another spike, and
> > by measuring pixel widths in xload, came up with 30 pixels @ 10 seconds per
> > pixel, or 300 seconds, or exactly 5 minutes, which seems awfully round.
> > 
> > Re: overclocking thing: ok, people, I know it's my machine.  Take a chill
> > pill.  I have a very stable CPU, a well ventilated machine, and a jumperless
> > motherboard that makes it very easy to switch settings.  However, as I have
> > said, this machine has been rock solid (except for during a few of those 
> > sketchy 3.1 release ;)  I'll go ahead and try turning off the overclocking
> > and see if 
> > a) it affects the voltage (which does worry me a bit)
> > b) I continue to see this load strangeness (I suspect I will)
> > 
> > --David Bushong
> > 
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Reply via email to