On 03/29/2017 08:10, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Erm, actually, the so-called "gnupg signature format", better known as > "the OpenPGP signature format", is pretty well documented in RFC 4880. > Note that this remark has no bearing on any of your other arguments, or > on your work as a whole; I just wanted to clarify this particular point :)
Noted, though I think I'd prefer a format that's directly supported by OpenSSL. > G'luck, > Peter >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
