On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> wrote: > grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> writes: >> https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=freebsd > That doesn't indicate a vulnerability. Shell code is what you use to
Yep, sec folks are aware of the difference between sample and exploit code, and vulnerabilities. https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories.html http://shell-storm.org/shellcode/ The post wasn't meant to "indicate a vulnerability". But as a heads up that maybe some might end up being published there. On the other hand, there are countless eyes on it, so OS vendors will find out in time, even if they aren't eyeballing it themselves. > legal advice Let us all get legal advice before living, as it might entail risks ;) Lots of sites offer a variety of advice for those facing risks. Here are some related to employers, browsing, and law... https://intelexit.org/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fklxuoBXXqw https://www.torproject.org/ https://geti2p.net/ https://www.eff.org/ IANAGPA, but they do exist. (Btw, the pentest turned out to be old Nessus and Metasploit stuff.) _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
