Hi, if you look at the advisory, it states "Affects: All supported versions of FreeBSD.", while in the "Corrected" section 10.1 & 10.2 are missing.
They are still supported, so the fix for them must be developed or they must be listed as not affected, if that's the case. Regards, Vladimir On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Gregory Orange <gregory.ora...@calorieking.com> wrote: > On 04/11/16 16:39, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> Security advisories should state explicitly when otherwise supported >> versions are not vulnerable. It's surprising this isn't already the case. > I disagree. If none of the version I have installed are listed, I don't read > the rest of the advisory. Time saved. Listing them in a 'not affected' part > of the message would add complexity and parsing for me - less time saved. > > Greg. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
