On 8/13/2015 2:15 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:01:29PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 08:40:23PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: >> >>> [info@ removed, not sure why that email address was included.] >> >> I'm hoping for pressure from above, as this is an important step that's >> evidently being taken without quarterly branch security being bumped up in >> priority. It seems to come as a surprise to many folks, and certainly I >> wasn't aware of it until last week. (Also, board@ is now deprecated.) >> > > "Putting pressure" isn't the role of the Foundation. > > Quarterly package builds happen every few days (two, if I remember > correctly), and as I was writing this reply, and updated package set for > 10.x i386 was made available. >
[I run the package builds] Correct, two. I think the biggest problem is just the frequency of builds. The items listed in the `pkg audit' output are normally backported to the quarterly branch quickly. I am exploring ways of making the quarterly builds run multiples times per day. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
