On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Roger Marquis <marq...@roble.com> wrote:
> I recommended an openssl_base port so that > security vulnerabilities (not necessarily protocol weaknesses) could be > more easily remediated (than installworld) and so 'pkg audit' could > report on those. > Exactly how would that differ from using freebsd-update? -- As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is not confidential. Any middle-man or recipient may inspect, modify, copy, forward, reply to, delete, or filter email for any purpose unless said parties are otherwise obligated. As the sender, I acknowledge that I have a lower expectation of the control and privacy of this message than I would a post-card. Further, nothing in this message is legally binding without cryptographic evidence of its integrity. http://bilbo.hobbiton.org/wiki/Eat_My_Sig _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
