Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Can you say which email servers *other* than unpatched Ironport fail?

> Cisco has known about this for many months; see 
> <https://tools.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCuo25276>

Note that Bug CSCuo25276 is considered duplicate of the bug CSCuo25329.

> If that's true (I can't confirm), why would we want to do a patch to our core 
> crypto?

Good question. The following should be taken into consideration.

According CSCuo25329, the issue has been fixed on Mar 2,2015 in
8.0.2-055 and 8.5.6-063 release of Cisco Email Security Appliance.

There are three known affected releases only - 8.0.1-023, 8.5.0-473,
8.5.5-280

Dan

_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to