Nathan Dorfman <n...@rtfm.net> writes: > Moving on, is it not worth talking about going in and defining every > -DOPENSSL_NO_* flag that exists and doesn't break the base system? On > the simple grounds that there appears to be little to be gained from > this kind of feeping creaturism, and plenty, as it turns out, to be > lost.
This is similar in principle to what Peter did with svnlite. Worth considering. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"