Nathan Dorfman <n...@rtfm.net> writes:
> Moving on, is it not worth talking about going in and defining every
> -DOPENSSL_NO_* flag that exists and doesn't break the base system? On
> the simple grounds that there appears to be little to be gained from
> this kind of feeping creaturism, and plenty, as it turns out, to be
> lost.

This is similar in principle to what Peter did with svnlite.  Worth
considering.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to