On 2012-02-19 08:50, Martin Schütte wrote: > On 17.02.2012 20:48, Roger Marquis wrote: >> and difficult to change without breaking more than it fixes. The current >> syslog syntax timestamp has been reliable now for what, 25+ years? I >> don't personally see any measurable ROI from changing it. YMMV of >> course. > > I really understand the concern, but some requirements do change over > time. Staying at the lowest common denominator for 25+ years may > indicate robustness, but it may also indicate obsolence. >
What seems obsolete is this thread. Can you at least prepended [OT RANT] to the subject? Some people monitor this list to be informed of possible FreeBSD security issues, of which this isn't. Please, get a motel room or something... johnea _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
