On 12/5/2011 2:48 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>
> Currently no (I thought you were in the cc list in my discussion with
> kib@?). My initial plan was simply rejecting .so's with wrong
> permissions but in the discussion turns out that would not be
> sufficient and we have also considered other ways to do it, e.g. have
> a wrapper where one can disable them completely. I have not a full
> solution yet as the change would touch quite a lot of things in the
> base system...
Hi Xin,
yes, I am on the cc list. I vaguely understand the complexity of the
issue enough to see its not an easy fix. In the mean time, I was just
looking for ways to protect the few boxes I have that run proftpd.
Right now running with "rootrevoke on" seems to be the safest, but that
has the side effect of killing active connections.
---Mike
--
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
