Not everybody requires LDAP/PAM , so making it part of base is not a
valid reason.
Same can apply for any other 3rd party port (Apache,Samba,etc etc).
On 09/17/2011 05:30 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/16/11 23:36, Mike Carlson wrote:
On 09/16/2011 08:05 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of
them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. I
believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into
base. My question is: which ones?
DES
LDAP support out of the box would be fantastic.
Mike C
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Also a strong vote for LDAP support. LDAP is our backend for several
server systems and it is a kind of pain
having to think first for the ports to be installed. Also I suspect and
hope a better integration if LDAP gets
part of the core system.
Regards,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
