-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ion,
Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: >>I have to agree on that statement. I would love to see branched ports. >>This can get very important on servers, were you don't want to have >>major upgrades, but only security updates. >>I guess it's a question of manpower, hm? > > > With the maintainers/commiters/physical_resources we have now this is > impossible. That's what I guessed... > Take a look at pav@'s PR stats page: http://www.oook.cz/bsd/prstats/ > There are ~1000 new ports PRs per month. The PT Team has managed to > close about the same number per month (fewer during the freeze, of > course). > Currently there are 551 open PRs. 238 in feedback state, etc. I see... > > >>Would a survey help? As in ask the ports team and FreeBSD >>administrators? Maybe some will start to become port maintainer too, >>just to support the increased work on ports due to branching them... >>I would :) > > > There are ~4300 unmaintained ports. Maybe you could start maintaining > some of them _now_ ? > I'll have a look into my ports tree. Let me guess, ports which are have the maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] are unmaintained? regards, Marian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEcZXhgAq87Uq5FMsRAnqFAJ4t0fO+uQTk/XRDFvTcA9ZLKuy6PACguig5 qAKibfTgwhzrVojGkHPyvpk= =6eKY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
