In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Garrett Wollman
 writes:
><<On Sat, 14 May 2005 04:20:19 +0200, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>said:
>
>> The political problem is that if all operating systems do that,
>> Intel has a pretty dud feature on their hands, and they are not
>> particularly eager to accept that fact.
>
>Intel already had a pretty dud feature on their hands; just ask anyone
>in the architecture community (probably including those who work for
>Intel).

While quite likely true, that is not really the issue here.

The question is what it will take to make Intel warn their customers.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
  • Re: FreeBSD Secu... David Schultz
    • Re: FreeBSD... Poul-Henning Kamp
      • Re: Fre... Drew B. [Security Expertise/Freelance Security research].
        • Re:... Poul-Henning Kamp
          • ... Drew B. [Security Expertise/Freelance Security research].
            • ... Chris
              • ... Colin Percival
              • ... Poul-Henning Kamp
              • ... Jason Stone
          • ... Garrett Wollman
            • ... Poul-Henning Kamp
          • ... Dag-Erling Smørgrav
          • ... David Schultz
            • ... Colin Percival

Reply via email to