On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: > Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable this > autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must be > long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two will > reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it?
Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ? _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
