On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Mel Flynn <rfl...@acsalaska.net> wrote: > On 2-6-2012 3:32, Steve Wills wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would >> like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which >> does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr. > > This may become obsolete soon, since graphics/gdal is going to be > updated, but with my current (slightly outdated) ports tree it fails > with not being able to find: > a) the ruby binary since there is no /usr/local/bin/ruby
This is expected. Try setting RUBY_DEFAULT_VER instead. > b) as a side-effect ruby.h, but also because swig is using a deprecated > Config interface that apparently is unable to set the include path > correctly. > Sounds like it just needs a s/Config/RbConfig/ which is a standard Ruby 1.9 comparability fix. Steve > swig-1.3.40 > RUBY_VER=1.9 in /etc/make.conf > RUBY config option set in graphics/gdal > > Given issues described with swig 1.x earlier on this list, you may want > to investigate if swig 1.x should be removed/patched/whatever before > this sweep. > -- > Mel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
