On 24/12/2018 13:37, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:07:54PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 24/12/2018 11:23, Chris Rees wrote: >>> On 24 Dec 2018 11:17, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 10:47:48AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: >>> > Author: crees (doc,ports committer) >>> > Date: Mon Dec 24 10:47:48 2018 >>> > New Revision: 342389 >>> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/342389 >>> > >>> > Log: >>> > Clarify kld_list format >>> > >>> > PR: docs/234248 >>> > Submitted by: David Fiander >>> > Submitted by: Miroslav Lachman >>> > >>> > Modified: >>> > head/share/man/man5/rc.conf.5 >>> > >>> > Modified: head/share/man/man5/rc.conf.5 >>> > >>> >>> ============================================================================== >>> > --- head/share/man/man5/rc.conf.5 Mon Dec 24 06:14:32 2018 >>> (r342388) >>> > +++ head/share/man/man5/rc.conf.5 Mon Dec 24 10:47:48 2018 >>> (r342389) >>> > @@ -248,12 +248,14 @@ Default >>> > .Pa /etc/ddb.conf . >>> > .It Va kld_list >>> > .Pq Vt str >>> > -A list of kernel modules to load right after the local >>> > -disks are mounted. >>> > +A whitespace-separated list of kernel modules to load right after >>> > +the local disks are mounted, without any >>> > +.Pa .ko >>> > +extension or path. >>> I think both extension and path are accepted if supplied. >>> It is the behaviour described in kldload(8). >>> >>> >>> That's true, but the kld rc script adds .ko, so providing the >>> extension will probably break, and it checks for existing modules >>> using the provided name as a regex, so that will also fail. >>> >>> I don't think that'd be hard to fix though, so I'll fix that and put a >>> patch up for review later. >> Having looked again, rc.subr uses kldstat -v, so the path is indeed not >> a problem, but the extension is-- removing any extension from _kld will >> ensure that it will always match correctly. At the moment it is >> fragile, because it will load correctly the first time but hit an error >> if the user has put the extension in and the module is already loaded. >> >> @RC people, does this look acceptable (I'll need approval please)? >> >> https://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/rc-kld_list-extension.diff > I do not quite see a point in the check for the module presence. > Kernel already rejects already loaded modules (by module name).
True; this code predates the -n option to kldload. Using that makes the whole checking unnecessary. How about this one? https://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/rc-kld_list-extension-2.diff Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ freebsd-rc@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-rc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
