Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]> wrote in <[email protected]>:
mj> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:43:25AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: mj> > Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote mj> > in <cadlo839wqzapenuqdovpq74yjcmkpqncekpvs_n9xnwmlrk...@mail.gmail.com>: mj> > mj> > ut> On 2 November 2012 14:21, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: mj> > ut> > On 2 November 2012 09:56, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: mj> > ut> >> I'll take a look. mj> > ut> > mj> > ut> > untested: mj> > ut> mj> > ut> Based on Eitan's patch, I've tested this one, and documented it in mount(8) too: mj> > ut> mj> > ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mountonlylate.diff mj> > ut> mj> > ut> Does anyone have any suggestions/objections/urge to approve it? mj> > mj> > Is the original problem due to backgrounding of NFS mount only? If mj> > so, implementing prevention of duplicate invocation into mount(8) mj> > would be more reasonable, I think. mj> > mj> mj> We have 2 distinct scripts that try to mount same set of filesystems. mj> I think this is the real bug here and proposed patches makes it go away in mj> an IMHO acceptable way. I just wanted to make sure if the case is limited to background NFS mount or not. rc.d/mountlate just tries to mount the filesystems that are not mounted yet at that time in addition to the "late" ones, not always to mount the same set twice. If it is a bug, it is better to simply fix -l to exclude not-yet-mounted ones without "late" keyword than adding another option. -- Hiroki
pgpUIIqBlLUpq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
