Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote in <[email protected]>:
ut> The following reply was made to PR conf/167566; it has been noted by GNATS. ut> ut> From: Chris Rees <[email protected]> ut> To: [email protected] ut> Cc: ut> Subject: Re: conf/167566 ut> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:24:51 +0100 ut> ut> The correct fix would be to add REQUIRE: natd to ipfw. ut> ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/167566.diff ut> ut> Please would someone take a look? I think ipdivert module should be loaded in the ipfw script when natd_enable=YES because ipfw_nat is loaded in that way. Can you (or anyone) test the patch at http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/ipfw.20121027-1.diff ? -- Hiroki
pgpTepf7KQM8g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
